Page 1 of 2

Oh no, also JYD was infected by leaderboard's fever !

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 12:20 pm
by Marco Marocco
the leadearboard's fever infected also JYD ... :cry:
now I'm waiting for majhong's inps ... :cry: :cry: :cry: :cry:

Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2007 1:14 pm
by tar
:arrow: What does majhong mean?
what is the websters definition of it?
card game de Japon ?
trivia
trivial

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:27 am
by welby1
It's basically, Chinese poker, but with more 'cards' and combos; more odds based play, and there are strategies, but it's still betting game.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:14 am
by destructor
welby1 wrote:but it's still betting game.
Some mahjongs are betting, some not.

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:36 pm
by welby1
True, some don't require a bet, but they are all odds based and non-competitive. Basically, any game played in a casino is a gambling game, which is about the only place it's played commonly. Poker with extra cards is still poker.

I see what you mean...that's a lot of clones on those racing games!

Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2007 11:33 pm
by mahlemiut
I've never seen a gambling game with a high score table before...

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:40 am
by welby1
Hmm...I think most of them do have a pts scoring system, as that's how payout is determined at the bars/casinos...as for tables for top players, not any are coming to mind, though some surely do. Some of the poker scores are defined on the cabinet only. However, if they made as many poker/card game variations as there are for mahjong, I'm sure some would. Many of the mahjong's don't have highscore tables.
I enjoy playing certain pc mahjong games, but not many of the arcade versions(too many keyboard only games with no indications which keys do what). I also like card games(free cell) on the pc...they are for relaxing/mind numbing, not competition.
Anyone enjoy any of the 'windows' games?

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:17 am
by destructor
Some mahjongs have the end. You can finish some mahjongs.

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 4:59 am
by Marco Marocco
What's the sense to keep in leaderboard games like these or quiz and similar ?

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 5:00 am
by mahlemiut
Shanghai (tile matching type stuff) is boring.

Now if only I could figure out hanafuda... :)

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 7:43 am
by destructor
Marco Marocco wrote:What's the sense to keep in leaderboard games like these or quiz and similar ?
Why not? Because you are weak in these games?

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 9:46 am
by Marco Marocco
destructor wrote:
Marco Marocco wrote:What's the sense to keep in leaderboard games like these or quiz and similar ?
Why not? Because you are weak in these games?
:roll:

Because they seem very far from the concept of arcade game, but this is my opinion.
Don't you think there is something strange in leaderboard ?
I don't want a flame, only to know your opinion about

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 10:18 am
by Marco Marocco
destructor wrote:
Marco Marocco wrote:What's the sense to keep in leaderboard games like these or quiz and similar ?
Why not? Because you are weak in these games?
Your argument is weak ... I think it's possible to debate avoiding personal attacks, ok?

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 11:07 am
by destructor
Each player can play on these games, I don't see problem. Are bugs in there games? No. Then play ;)

Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2007 1:05 pm
by The TJT
Card/board games are not really videogames, even though they are played on a computer.
For most part/all you don't need hand-eye coordination, timing or reflexes. I guess you can use a sort of pattern recognizion in some of them, but even that is very different from let's say Tron, Pacman, Phoenix etc.