Page 5 of 6
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:15 am
by Blost
got myself a conroe to play with, E6600, 1go DDR2 and a 7600GS (XP SP2) :
Posted: Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:15 pm
by Chad
wow how does a dual core 2.4ghz get such great speeds?? cool.
Posted: Sat Sep 23, 2006 6:44 am
by Blost
Chad wrote:wow how does a dual core 2.4ghz get such great speeds?? cool.
guess the 4mb cache must help.
oh and i forgot to mention that i was in 1280*1024.
Posted: Tue Oct 10, 2006 7:23 am
by Blost
Pushed the conroe a bit (to 3.0ghz) :
Posted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 1:37 am
by Chad
intel duo core 2.0ghz
intel 945GM graphics
1440x900x32
nice space invaders multithreaded fps, must be a problem of some sort though 2*255=510<>3380?
Code: Select all
mame101 mame111 mame111-mt
pacman 819.6 354.7 2828.1
malzak 543.2 387.3 2139.5
ddragon 347.1 200.5 231.0
tbyahhoo 405.4 201.6 244.7
stunrun 205.8 167.9 196.7
mrdrillr 74.6 64.5 70.3
tekken 106.9 92.2 100.5
cotton2 29.3 125.5 148.3
invaders 989.3 255.5 3380.4
suplup 80.5 84.6 84.5
swtrilgy 13.1 10.9 10.9
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 4:10 am
by mahlemiut
Just a short test to see if the compiler update makes much difference...
Values are speed%, as displayed when MAME exits.
First is for MAME 0.118u6, compiled using GCC 3.4.2, second for MAME 0.118, compiled with GCC 4.2.1
Commandline parameters are -norc, -nothrottle, -str 30
sfiiin (Capcom CPS-3) : 247.40% : 251.23%
galaga (Namco Galaga hardware): 551.44% : 555.36%
cotton2 (Sega ST-V) : 165.39% : 162.54%
beastrzr (Raizing/Sony ZN-1) : 106.29% : 100.53%
strider (Capcom CPS-1) : 446.05% : 452.85%
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 8:27 am
by Kaiser
Mahlemiut, check out how rsgun (Radiant silvergun, ST-V hardware) runs both in mame 118 and u6.....
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2007 10:06 am
by mahlemiut
rsgun (Sega ST-V) : 0.118u6 = 143.86% : 0.118 = 138.89%
I extended the length (-str) to 60 seconds, but that's still not long enough to get to an in-game demo.
Posted: Sat Sep 29, 2007 10:14 am
by mahlemiut
One more list, this time using MAME 0.119u1 compiled using Visual C++ 2005 Express:
sfiiin : 228.75%
galaga : 229.91% (what?!?)
cotton2 : 169.61%
beastrzr : 98.00%
strider : 248.59% (again... what?!?)
Posted: Sun Oct 14, 2007 4:58 pm
by LordGaz
Just finished building a new system after my old one died on me:
Motherboard: ASUS Socket 775 P5K3 Deluxe WiFi edition
CPU: Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 @ 3GHz, 2GB DDR3 RAM
Graphics: XFX GeForce 8800 Ultra XXX, 675MHz factory overclocked
Sound: Onboard SoundMAX
OS: Windows XP SP2 Home
Desktop res: 1152x864
Benchmark script:
mame119.exe %1 -seconds_to_run %2 -skip_gameinfo -nothrottle -nohws -multithreading -video d3d -triplebuffer
Average Speed Results:
Code: Select all
Game str Ave speed
_____________________________
pacman 600 9201%
malzak 600 4756%
ddragon 60 733%
invaders 600 1105%
tbyahhoo 60 837%
stunrun 60 453%
mrdrillr 60 188%
tekken 60 330%
cotton2 60 470%
beastrzr 60 258%
puzzloop 60 334%
sfiiin 60 695%
galaga 200 2686%
strider 100 1748%
rsgun 100 374%
The -multithreading makes a
big difference on a multi-core CPU system especially for the faster games.
Re: Benchmarks
Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 7:53 am
by mahlemiut
Upgrade time!
2.53GHz Intel Core2Duo E7200 (3MB cache)
512MB Asus EN6800GT
2GB RAM
Ubuntu 8.04 (Linux kernel 2.6.24)
SDLMAME 0.126 (64-bit, self compiled with GCC 4.2.3)
Switches used: -norc -nothrottle -nowindow -skip_gameinfo -str 60 -rompath -video opengl
Scores are average speed %, first is without -mt, second is with -mt
Code: Select all
pacman 2766.88 4213.92
malzak 1879.70 2156.04
ddragon 432.91 444.00
invaders 1003.57 1124.76
tbyahhoo 555.84 537.60
stunrun 317.44 317.74
mrdrillr 131.96 128.87
cotton2 344.11 362.18
beastrzr 206.14 208.98
puzzloop 165.34 169.16
sfiiin 450.22 485.03
strider 1067.12 1124.65
rsgun 277.52 310.44
Re: Benchmarks
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 12:11 pm
by Blost
the old Conroe has been replaced by a Penryn E8500.
just started playing a bit with it (1280*1024/XP SP3/-skip_gameinfo -nothrottle -nohws -mt -video d3d -triplebuffer) :
Re: Benchmarks
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2008 4:56 pm
by Blost
oups the first results are actually achieved with Mame 0.119 and not with Wolfmame 0.127!

Re: Benchmarks
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 12:59 am
by LordGaz
Anyone feel like running the benchmarks for the latest CPUs to see how they fare? I assume the Ryzen range won't benefit that much from its 8 cores since MAME is mainly single core driven but it would be interesting to see how it fares against Kabylake for example and especially because I want to build myself a new comp pretty soon. Still running on 32 bit here

.
Re: Benchmarks
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2017 3:45 am
by mahlemiut
Well, I did finally get a new (cheapo) system about a month ago, probably about time this thread was updated.
