Page 3 of 3
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 9:34 am
by mahlemiut
It would probably be a lot easier to manage if leaderboard points simply weren't awarded for "non-secure" inps. It would also be a lot easier to undo if this decision is reversed at a later date. I'm sure it would a simple code change that Zwaxy could implement in no time.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 10:45 am
by destructor
When somebody will see non secure replay on first position can tell -> MARPers are cheaters.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 7:45 pm
by Zhorik
mahlemiut wrote:It would probably be a lot easier to manage if leaderboard points simply weren't awarded for "non-secure" inps. It would also be a lot easier to undo if this decision is reversed at a later date. I'm sure it would a simple code change that Zwaxy could implement in no time.
Is anything that ends up getting decided on this going to require a code change by Zwaxy? Has anybody touched base with him to let him know this is likely coming and make sure he's willing to touch the code this way?
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2007 8:22 pm
by mahlemiut
Zeroing inps won't require a code change, but it does require an editor to actually do it, and restoring it afterwards, especially if a player uploaded on the game numerous times, may not be so easy.
Personally, I'd prefer something a bit more automatic.