[ POLL ] Golf games split/archive

[***PL***]

***PL***

1) YES
2) B

NOTE: there are HUGE implications with this vote!!! If A wins, MARP editors certainly will revaluate ALL splits based on courses alone and have more future polls. Likewise, if B passes, we could eventually "merge" all clones, keeping only the parents split.

[discussion at other thread please -tjt]

[sawys]

Sawys@jvrm.net

1 - NO
2 - B (but i do'nt understand why i vote because i vote NO 1st)

[welby1]

and of course none of the people voting to change(yes) have even bothered to play a game of golden tee either. I don't see much point in wasting time on marp in the future if only to get screwed when something works to my favour. Evidently, if you can't beat a score, get it archived.

[BBH]

BBH

1. YES
2. A

[Blost]

and of course none of the people voting to change(yes) have even bothered to play a game of golden tee either.

i did, on the older ones though.
not much clones to play with, but there are more competitors on those than you and ze germans, maybe you'll want to give it a try...

[Frankie]

Frankie

1. Yes
2. B

[Zhorik]

- gastrainga

1) Yes
2) B

[The TJT]

Allright, vote's ended.
Following results:

1. "YES" 13/17 =76%
2. "B" 12/17=71%

This means that golf clone course-splits will be merged.
Example:

golf.zip has 2 clones: golf2.zip and golf3.zip, each romset has 3 courses.

MARP tracks for golf +clones:

Before::
golf(course 1)
golf(course 2)
golf(course 3)

golf2(course 1)
golf2(course 2)
golf2(course 3)

golf3(course 1)
golf3(course 2)
golf3(course 3)

=>

After:
golf(course 1)
golf(course 2)
golf(course 3)

golf2(any course)
golf3(any course)
*************************

I feel this was a decent compromise and hope this will make golf submissions of greater value.

Thank you for your votes.