Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2005 11:42 pm
so you're saying it would be better if one person can play it back? The argument against this (or for that at least two people must play something back) is that there is a much greater chance (if one person plays something back) that the playback in question could have been a fluke and may not happen consistantly. This can hapen if two people get it to playback but it's much less likely.
Remember also, the zeroed recording is not deleted. In the marp entry, a pointer to the playbackability board message is entered so even the people that couldn't play it back could refer to the post to determine how one person got it to playback. Then, if they can play it back with this information, they can be the 2nd person to play it back correctly and then the recording could be reinstated (as long as the original poster states they can also play it back which should be a given.)
Remember also, the zeroed recording is not deleted. In the marp entry, a pointer to the playbackability board message is entered so even the people that couldn't play it back could refer to the post to determine how one person got it to playback. Then, if they can play it back with this information, they can be the 2nd person to play it back correctly and then the recording could be reinstated (as long as the original poster states they can also play it back which should be a given.)