Page 2 of 2
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 8:39 pm
by SJK
destructor wrote:No problem. My scores were poor
Some info for players:
40k =~ 4min 45sec =~ 1Wave
100k =~ 11min 53sec
200k =~ 23min 45sec =~ finish first 5 Waves
500k =~ 59min 23 sec
1mln =~ 1h 58min 45sec
Good luck.
and no inps until the last minute?
Posted: Mon Apr 26, 2004 9:12 pm
by destructor
Yes
----------------
1 question more. From which moment is counted 30 seconds on secon half-stage:
a) immediatelly after end first half-stage
b) take instrument
c) take "joy control" over hero
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 3:14 pm
by Weehawk
destructor wrote:Yes
----------------
1 question more. From which moment is counted 30 seconds on secon half-stage:
a) immediatelly after end first half-stage
b) take instrument
c) take "joy control" over hero
I would start counting at the player's first movement or shot.
c) I guess that would be.
Also, note well all: It has been demonstrated to me that the Steve Perry stage gets difficult enough in later loops that a player may have legitimate difficulty finishing in 30 seconds. I have never seen leeching on this stage, so I may show some leniency on this stage as long as the player is earnestly trying to complete it.
Posted: Wed Apr 28, 2004 3:30 pm
by destructor
Oh. Thanks. If you take wrong way on this stage then time for finish this stage (first half and second sometimes too) can be longer than 30 seconds.
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:09 pm
by destructor
Ian Sutton is crazy.
4mln. Congrats.
How long is your inp? 8hours?
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:31 pm
by Ian Sutton
destructor wrote:Ian Sutton is crazy.
4mln. Congrats.
Thanks! There's still a few hours left though.
destructor wrote:How long is your inp? 8hours?
8 hours 38 minutes. While I was playing I kept thinking "some bastard is gonna play for 5 more minutes than I have and win" so I had to keep playing.
Btw, if someone submits a better score in the next few hours I might have to kill him.
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 4:47 pm
by SJK
me was quite far into doing an inp but not got enough time to get 4m
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 5:44 pm
by gameboy9
What's a little more amusing is that the top three submitted their scores on the last day.
Come on guys, this isn't poker!
(yes, i'm kidding.)
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:02 pm
by SJK
gameboy9 wrote:What's a little more amusing is that the top three submitted their scores on the last day.
Come on guys, this isn't poker!
(yes, i'm kidding.)
umm I submitted before then..
though I think it isn't nice to see any other scores until the end..
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 6:32 pm
by Weehawk
Congratulations and PM me your Paypal address.
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 8:53 pm
by destructor
Scores are excelent in this week. I wait for next weeks. MARP players are the best of the best
Posted: Fri Apr 30, 2004 10:39 pm
by Weehawk
Results:
1st: Ian Sutton
2nd: Destructor@HotTeam.pl
3rd: SJK
Perhaps I should have realized from the TG record 10 million, but my own play never would have proved that this was marathonable. I started to suspect when I saw some preliminary inps. If I had known from the start, I might have chosen a different game or settings. I hate to see anyone have to play a game for 8 hours.
On the other hand, it is very gratifying to see that people are being inspired to submit some really outstanding recorded performance to MARP because of this. It was sort of the whole point.
Posted: Sat May 01, 2004 6:15 am
by destructor
Please don't choose marathonable games Weehawk. This is very boring. Score depend only from free time, not from skills.