Page 2 of 2

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 12:00 pm
by Q.T.Quazar
yes, i agree with Kale. that solution makes the most sense.

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 9:06 pm
by The TJT
Novice wrote:DEFCON=2

I also wonder how they think about this problem who scream like a crazy "THE SPIRIT OF GAMES :lol: " at outrun and cameltry.
I don't get your lols. You are the least person to speak about spirit of games.
Go to English lessons, or something, stop using stupid defcons, grow up.

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 9:18 pm
by The TJT
Novice wrote:DEFCON=2

I also wonder how they think about this problem who scream like a crazy "THE SPIRIT OF GAMES :lol: " at outrun and cameltry.
You really do think they care? lol

Beginner

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:39 pm
by BBH
Novice wrote:DEFCON=2
BBH wrote:well, I was going to try to review all existing recordings so they could be edited to proper scores, but the changes in romsets on old versions made it difficult to get any of them to work. So I sort of forgot all about this.
DQ all others without finish is not problem I think.
clealy this game is not for money.
I don't agree that all recordings should be DQ'ed. Players who finish are already getting HUGE bonuses under this scoring system compared to those who don't. If nobody can playback the recordings and they aren't deleted, the old scores will still sit there and won't benefit from the 100k * levels completed they'd be getting. So I don't see why that's a problem.

I'll add in the Special Rules later, and if zfz hasn't done so himself, his score will be edited to 4,509,300...
I also wonder how they think about this problem who scream like a crazy "THE SPIRIT OF GAMES :lol: " at outrun and cameltry.
...huh?

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:39 pm
by Q.T.Quazar
The score plays back as advertised. As soon as there is a final decision on the scoring system, I will confirm.

Posted: Fri Jul 18, 2003 10:42 pm
by Q.T.Quazar
I also wonder how they think about this problem who scream like a crazy "THE SPIRIT OF GAMES :lol: " at outrun and cameltry.
maybe he's talking about point hunting rather than finishing as fast as possible?

or playing with the black marble?

Posted: Mon Jul 21, 2003 10:31 pm
by Novice
DEFCON=3
The TJT wrote: You are the least person to speak about spirit of games.
spirit of TJT is not always spirit of games. :lol:

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Thu Jan 06, 2011 9:23 am
by Kale
http://replay.marpirc.net/r/shadowld

This still doesn't have a special rule, as advertised by this topic. (and dunno why but I've just dreamt of this game, hence I've remembered it :o ...)

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 1:03 pm
by Phil Lamat
Special rules are there until 2004

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 2:17 pm
by Kale
I mean updating the scores? :/

Oh please, is there any effing usefulness of this Regulation Play chairman thing? Really, if the max I can do is to "tell" people about what they are supposed to do ... well, I'll withdraw the position asap. :evil:

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 6:06 pm
by The TJT
My opinion:

Someone give the guy editor rights for his RC term. I found it a bit tedious to ask for every edit during my time...
Well at least I had rights to edit special rules.

(Errr...you could as well give Kale QT's editor rights...)

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 8:30 pm
by Phil Lamat
All checked and edited, except for GameGuru, Bubble and Ozz.
If someone can playback one of them, let us know on what stage is the game over
(I suspect some playabck problems due to OS used)

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Fri Jan 07, 2011 10:21 pm
by mahlemiut
Kale: you should at least now be able to edit special rules.

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Sat Jan 08, 2011 9:51 am
by Kale
Ok, thanks :)

Re: Shadow-land scoring system

Posted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 9:07 pm
by Phil Lamat
Scores also fixed for clones (youkaidk/youkaidko).
At least those which playback correctly.
Others have the mention "pending special bonus" ... maybe someone can playback them ?