Moderator: Chad
style as well: 1 million for each checkpoint passed, wtf. 
Where are you from bob?Kale wrote: Other two inps where our Greek hero (?)
It's the same scoring system I saw in another similar games.Kale wrote: Scoring system he arbitrarily decided to use is
I haven't seen it yet.Kale wrote:..... takes advantage of -nothrottle at POST screens to bump his percentages, just like Final Fight Revenge.
Confirmation only means that it is confirmed to play back to the claimed score, not necessarily that no Marp rules were broken in the recording and that it won't at some point in the future potentially be zeroed.PP. wrote:Meanwhile I've posted a thread about "calspeed" in which two players have speed <90% just like Final Fight Revenge, the confirmer saw it and confirmed score!
Yes, I already know this.BeeJay wrote: Confirmation only means that it is confirmed to play back to the claimed score, not necessarily that no Marp rules were broken in the recording and that it won't at some point in the future potentially be zeroed.
Please also be aware that not everyone who can confirm a score has the necessary permissions to be able to "zero" a score, if it is found to be breaking any Marp rules such as < 90% speed.
PP. wrote:I just watched my sidebsja's inp. Unlike ffreveng, my speed during the race is clearly >90%.
My games were legal, as I explained.BeeJay wrote:Thanks Kale. Both scores zeroed for < 90% speed during game play.
You claimed they were played at an average > 90% but they were so frequently below 90% during the important parts of game play, when watching with the stats displayed, that they do not meet Marp's minimum speed requirements.PP. wrote:My games were legal, as I explained.
There was a posting for a TK2012 and PP games running below speed, and they were dealt to. Looking again at that posting you mentioned in passing about another score but it would be better to put in a separate posting as that could easily have been lost in the noise.PP. wrote:And what about ffreveng, why you still keep it there after so many months?
Actually, the scores which were deleted were first reported in March 2017. That's hardly immediately.PP. wrote:How funny and unfair attitude, my inps are deleted immediately because some idiot said so, other illegal inps which have many times reported and recognized by mods, still remain...
No, I said that the average speed within the driving periods is >90%BeeJay wrote: You claimed they were played at an average > 90% but they were so frequently below 90% during the important parts of game play, when watching with the stats displayed, that they do not meet Marp's minimum speed requirements.]
TK's score was deleted. SFCHAMPION's score was not deleted, even that I was told that it will.BeeJay wrote: There was a posting for a TK2012 and PP games running below speed, and they were dealt to. Looking again at that posting you mentioned in passing about another score but it would be better to put in a separate posting as that could easily have been lost in the noise.
Apparently last March it was made clear that my inps were legal. Now Kale brings it back again, and of course you get the opportunityBeeJay wrote: Actually, the scores which were deleted were first reported in March 2017. That's hardly immediately.
-skito]The same goes -> Also applies to.n) Using Pause 'P' or suspending the MAME program to take advantage of more time while making a recording will not be allowed. The same goes for turning throttling off 'F10' to speed up MAME beyond normal speed.
Then why they keep his bogus inps?Kale wrote:There's no special protection for saulonpb.
Don't tell me garbage, you asked for my Side to Side score to be deleted because of speed downgrade, and it was immediately deleted(although in fact there was not)Kale wrote:Because you don't shut up?
Pushing the threads with "oh noes, editors gives a special treatment to saulonpb" doesn't give room for editors to do their job.
Because important stuff gets lost between YOUR OWN rants.
