PP. wrote:You have an easy first place in that game, so why not me too.

Moderator: BBH
PP. wrote:You have an easy first place in that game, so why not me too.
Yes, I do get tired. I got tired for one week to even read your daily circus.PP. wrote:Once more you make a stupid post just to create another clash... Don't you ever get tired?
What's the problem with "dear"? Is it a bad word in your language?
Reporting the issues and questions in site's games sounds like "complain" to you?
Try to post like a normal person not like a mad man, all these msgs against me are totally garbabge. Your level is low.
About "megat4st" I' m not sure if I understood that time trick. However I' ll try.
So "who cares and who gives a fu* care" but as you see Phil and me care.
As I said this is an easy first place(at least for me) because questions are repeatable.
I do not harass anyone. You harass me.giro-X wrote:
Yes, I do get tired. I got tired for one week to even read your daily circus.
Nobody here is your "dear", how you put it right there was just one of those tricks you do to harass people.
You have no reason to be angry with me because I do not disturb you. You disturb me. Looks like this gives sense to your life...giro-X wrote: Funny also how you tell me I always, always write down lot of garbage, that I am the mad one (I am not mad, I'm angry, and you are one of the reasons) and you can't even be calm enough to check your spelling, leaving a mistake on "garbage".
What people? Its only you.giro-X wrote: Once again you don't understand a word of what people tell to you, and furthermore you didn't understand my point at all. I do not care of "whether it will be considered legit or not to allow an user to change the date on their computer while recording for a particular game, since generally this is an undesired behaviour and strongly discouraged/forbidden, e.g. in tournaments". If anyone out there really wants to spend days wondering if it's legit or not just to allow a guy like you to place some scores (no matter if good or bad) on a bunch of Megatouch games, that's their problem. I "had" to specify this, since I was the one giving you the explanation on how to properly run the game. I gave you the explanation, but I don't also want to tell you "well then, since changing the date is not ethic, please accept that nobody should send new replays to those games". Do you want to break any ethics just because you can't beat people on classic games, on parent/clone where everybody has submitted scores for years? Free to do so on your willing, it will be your problem.
What?pred wrote:You talk with him and cut the crap please.
Perhaps if the uploads weren't flooded with so many crap recordings things like this would be more likely to get spotted. Unfortunately, as long as there are people flooding the system with cheap 1st place recordings things like this are going to get lost in the noise.PP. wrote:This man cheats and uploads again fake scores.
Sorry but you sound like giro-X. What "cheap 1st place recording"?? Can't you see there is a hard competition? First places change hands almost every day. Many hours of effort.BeeJay wrote: Perhaps if the uploads weren't flooded with so many crap recordings things................................Unfortunately, as long as there are people flooding the system with cheap 1st place recordings things.....
I agree with thisBeeJay wrote:Perhaps if the uploads weren't flooded with so many crap recordings things like this would be more likely to get spotted. Unfortunately, as long as there are people flooding the system with cheap 1st place recordings things like this are going to get lost in the noise.PP. wrote:This man cheats and uploads again fake scores.
Having said that, I suggest that you put up a separate topic on the Playbackability forum (viewforum.php?f=12) when you find an issue with a recording/playback so that it doesn't get lost in the noise of a multi-page topic like this one has become. A separate topic also makes it easier for a moderator/editor to see when a recording can't be played back by 3 or more MARP users and can therefore be zeroed.
Cheers,
BeeJay.
Hm.... a quick look at recent uploads shows the following after < 1 minute of looking:PP. wrote:Sorry but you sound like giro-X. What "cheap 1st place recording"?? Can't you see there is a hard competition? First places change hands almost every day. Many hours of effort.
Only a few really low/cheap scores are remaining now.
The way you talk shows that you have cheap brains.BeeJay wrote: J. J. Squawkers (older)
saulonpb 187,330
pp 174,900
High-score on the parent set: 2,180,760
That's one example on the sort of cheap 1st place recordings I'm referring to, where you get a small percentage of the high score on the parent, or other clones, and only claim 1st place because it's a 'newish' clone. There are a myriad of other examples that fall into the same category someone like you or saulonpb upload a score that wouldn't even get you close to the top 10 on the sets that were emulated earlier solely for the purpose of claiming a cheap 1st place position.
It's because you two haven't learned to respect other people's hard work. That why you call it "crap" and "cheap".BeeJay wrote: By the way, if I sound like giro-x it's probably because like him and numerous other Marp members we're sick and tired of seeing these crap and cheap recordings flooding the uploads and risking recordings that truly deserve attention from significant effort being put into those games getting lost in the excessive noise.
But this is already beaten by kangseungkooPG3 wrote: Beat the record in a few hours of efforthttp://replay.marpirc.net/r/snowbros
You agree, but when you were asked to confirm a bogus score you said that it is not worth your time...simpsons99 wrote:I agree with thisBeeJay wrote: Having said that, I suggest that you put up a separate topic on the Playbackability forum (viewforum.php?f=12) when you find an issue with a recording/playback so that it doesn't get lost in the noise of a multi-page topic like this one has become. A separate topic also makes it easier for a moderator/editor to see when a recording can't be played back by 3 or more MARP users and can therefore be zeroed.