
I know voting 10 games is a overkill but that way we don't have everyone voting only their own picks...
Randomizer seemed a bit unfair since some nominated 1 game and some 15...
Moderators: mahlemiut, seymour, QRS
So my voting thread is void?The_Pro wrote:Looks like we're using the google doc, so do it.
Yeah well I see a few problems with the google doc:The_Pro wrote:I dunno, I'm just trying to get things moving. The thread is still good in that we can add the selections to the doc. I'm not on facebook either so I don't know the extent of the chatting there. I agree there as some flaws, for example a number value for how good you are is subjective, my 5 is not like someone else's 5. I think TRB is the owner of the doc/facebook group if you wanna discuss it.
Ok that makes sense. Thanks!OMG Kreygasm wrote:I interpreted the MARP thread as voting on which games we'd like to see in and I interpreted the Google doc as a means to determine various players' strength on the games. I'm sure different people have/had different interpretations on them though. I think going forward once the tourney games are set globally, the Google doc will be good to use as a means to mark which games we will focus on and ensure we have coverage.
Yes sir that was at least how I thought to use it/them. I'm not sure if others are going about it the same way but that made the most sense to me. Yeah I think Google doc will be great to use when we start to sort of "claim" games that we have particular strength in or perhaps ones that we may simply want to try out or spend time on.The TJT wrote:
So in other words the google doc is sort of telling voters who are good at which games - while the MARP vote is the vote to choose the games...