Crazy Rally World Record after 27 years (again)

General discussion on MAME, MARP, or whatever else that doesn't belong in any of the other forums

Moderators: mahlemiut, seymour, QRS

Post Reply
User avatar
PAC-MAN
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:31 am

Crazy Rally World Record after 27 years (again)

Post by PAC-MAN »

The World Record this time with version Wolfmame 106 (thanks to KALE!):
http://replay.marpirc.net/inp/4/7/4/pac ... olf106.zip
User avatar
INNUENDO
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 581
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 12:49 am
Location: Brasília, Brasil
Contact:

Re: Crazy Rally World Record after 27 years (again)

Post by INNUENDO »

When a player is great he can do again. Congratulations, Pac. If the speed of the game in 0.106 is wrong again, for the third time you´ll do again in the next emulator.
Long life to good games
User avatar
PAC-MAN
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 108
Joined: Wed Mar 31, 2010 6:31 am

Re: Crazy Rally World Record after 27 years (again)

Post by PAC-MAN »

Many thanks, innuendo! :wink:
User avatar
Kale
MARP Seer
MARP Seer
Posts: 655
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 5:53 pm

Re: Crazy Rally World Record after 27 years (again)

Post by Kale »

INNUENDO wrote:When a player is great he can do again. Congratulations, Pac. If the speed of the game in 0.106 is wrong again, for the third time you´ll do again in the next emulator.
I sense some kind of sarcasm on this one, so let's clarify things:

The Z80 clock on this one was measured from a real PCB, but in the end the change was quite minimal after checking it out (barely noticeable via screenshot reg test, presumably). And, unless nobody ever do HW tests on the real machine for waitstate support (that is very unlikely anyway), the speed will hopefully never change again. Now, even if shmups guys says that a single frame counts (so they do "lagless" versions and crap like that) I'm not that extreme, I was just pointing out that there was a different clock speed and that's it. Otherwise, the editors are going to invalidate every single CPS-1 inp made prior to the forecoming 0.148, just because I've just changed the pixel clock in it ... for a barely noticeable difference in FPS (something like half frame per second faster). I'll let you decide if that is even fair, but I don't have any doubt about it ...

Returning to Crazy Rally, the fun part about this one is that I was just curious to know about why you (PAC) used an ancient version of MAME, and obviously stumbled across the WIP logs and reported back a fact, even though with colorful words I admit (sometimes I can be very harsh, but it's how I live anyway). By re-doing the inp proved that you weren't cheating in the first place and I appreciate that.
Post Reply