Ok I've looked this game better.
It's a timed game, some players have already used multiple credits (2 seems enough) to play a whole 9 innings match like we usually do for baseball games.
I will add this rule in the special rules link soon.
But other question is :
if you win 1st match (not easy, only Craig & GK did that) you get 20k and you're allowed to play a second match ;
do we allow to go on with other credits, till you lose a match ?
Note that there is a Gamest hiscore on this game : 85,559.
I doubt this score has been made only with 1 match.
Ghemant, any info on Gamest rules for this ?
Dokaben
Moderator: BBH
-
Q. T. Quazar
- Button Masher
- Posts: 98
- Joined: Thu Apr 22, 2010 5:01 pm
Re: Dokaben
I'm okay with that, but I think we need to go back and revise the sports rule.
If we're allowing more credits on games where you are still winning, but would have to stop playing unfairly because of a timer, then we should change back some of the sports games where you lose if you miss a putt or whatnot, rather than 'allowing players to finish the game'
so, for example, with NeoGeo, 2020 Baseball you would put in credits for a full game, since you can be winning but knocked out by the timer. this type of game is unaffected.
NeoTurfMasters, on the other hand, you would be out as soon as your credit expires--since it IS possible to finish a game on one credit.
this would give three categories of sports games, with consistent rules for each:
those that allow you to play a 'full game' until you lose a game (eg: 10 yard fight)
those that allow you to play for as long as you can survive without making too many mistakes (eg: fighting golf)
those that are quarter munchers, and eliminate you on a preset timer (nba jam)
in this case, players would also be allowed to quarter up after a full game (if the game would end) if the difficulty is going to continue to escalate in the next game.
so, in short, we stick to one credit rule when possible, and when not possible, player is allowed to continue as long as they are winning and have not made 'critical mistakes' that have caused the game to stop.
If we're allowing more credits on games where you are still winning, but would have to stop playing unfairly because of a timer, then we should change back some of the sports games where you lose if you miss a putt or whatnot, rather than 'allowing players to finish the game'
so, for example, with NeoGeo, 2020 Baseball you would put in credits for a full game, since you can be winning but knocked out by the timer. this type of game is unaffected.
NeoTurfMasters, on the other hand, you would be out as soon as your credit expires--since it IS possible to finish a game on one credit.
this would give three categories of sports games, with consistent rules for each:
those that allow you to play a 'full game' until you lose a game (eg: 10 yard fight)
those that allow you to play for as long as you can survive without making too many mistakes (eg: fighting golf)
those that are quarter munchers, and eliminate you on a preset timer (nba jam)
in this case, players would also be allowed to quarter up after a full game (if the game would end) if the difficulty is going to continue to escalate in the next game.
so, in short, we stick to one credit rule when possible, and when not possible, player is allowed to continue as long as they are winning and have not made 'critical mistakes' that have caused the game to stop.