The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
Moderators: mahlemiut, seymour, QRS
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
backups are being done, they should be safe if the backup works.
-skito
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
Zwaxy says he has a backup of everything.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer

MARP Assistant Web Maintainer

Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
Crap.
Thank God Zwaxy is actually and Englishman with relatively large brain...
Hope MARP finds a new home quickly.

Thank God Zwaxy is actually and Englishman with relatively large brain...

Hope MARP finds a new home quickly.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
Too bad...
I hope things will turn out right as soon as possible.
I hope things will turn out right as soon as possible.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
1 gig of network traffic per day?!?!? that seems a lot more than I expected.
how many hits on MARP per day? around 10,000?
how many hits on the "loads" from uploads page?
while "fancy", consider removing the snapshots from the "loads" page?
someone has show last 1000 scores for that... that's a big page!
if someone wanted to see what a game was they can click the game link to list scores and the snapshot for that particular game to see it.
just my $0.02...try and lessen the MARP footprint some.
how many hits on MARP per day? around 10,000?
how many hits on the "loads" from uploads page?
while "fancy", consider removing the snapshots from the "loads" page?
someone has show last 1000 scores for that... that's a big page!
if someone wanted to see what a game was they can click the game link to list scores and the snapshot for that particular game to see it.
just my $0.02...try and lessen the MARP footprint some.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
1 gig per day does seem like a lot. I don't think we should change the uploads link, the images have to be there to attract new users. But the existing users who use the uploads link frequently can trigger the no screenshots option in their frequently used shortcut to conserve bandwidth. still 1 gig does seem like a lot maybe it's bot traffic.
-skito
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
Yes, 1 Gig...per DAY...seems way too much. Daily visits for example for "loads" was what...30? per day.
Maybe the default for new users for "loads" was more than 50 hits. Or perhaps someone is clicking games starting with "A" and getting hundreds of hits.
Or bots/some programs getting info. Maws has a link "check for highscores" but I doubt that's it. I blame the Chinese.
Maybe the default for new users for "loads" was more than 50 hits. Or perhaps someone is clicking games starting with "A" and getting hundreds of hits.
Or bots/some programs getting info. Maws has a link "check for highscores" but I doubt that's it. I blame the Chinese.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
The default number of search hits displayed was too high. Yes, bots would have been pulling up tremendous numbers of images there.Chad wrote:1 gig per day does seem like a lot. I don't think we should change the uploads link, the images have to be there to attract new users. But the existing users who use the uploads link frequently can trigger the no screenshots option in their frequently used shortcut to conserve bandwidth. still 1 gig does seem like a lot maybe it's bot traffic.
John Cunningham (JTC)


Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer

MARP Assistant Web Maintainer

Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
cool. here's an uploads link that uses no pics if you want to see it that way.
http://replay.marpirc.net/index.cgi?mod ... pic_mode=0
seymore, or someone with sql access to the message board can we get a
update msg_board set text=replace(text,'marp.retrogames.com','replay.marpirc.net');
on the message board messages?
http://replay.marpirc.net/index.cgi?mod ... pic_mode=0
seymore, or someone with sql access to the message board can we get a
update msg_board set text=replace(text,'marp.retrogames.com','replay.marpirc.net');
on the message board messages?
-skito
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
sweet...maybe on the search page instead of the 9999 limit make the max default 500. I can't see someone even wanting 500 really...but it allows for flexibility. I look at either 50 or 100. Recently I redid my system so made new cookies. On doing so, the default uploads would crash on me. I went to the search page and found 9999 results as my default "default" value. I changed that to 100 and the uploads worked again.
just a thought as MARP looks forward...default defaults for new users or old users making new cookies etc.
just a thought as MARP looks forward...default defaults for new users or old users making new cookies etc.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
I believe Zwaxy set up a rewrite on marp.retrogames.com so that old links will still work on the new site. If it does become necessary at some point though, I'm sure it could be done then.Chad wrote:cool. here's an uploads link that uses no pics if you want to see it that way.
http://replay.marpirc.net/index.cgi?mod ... pic_mode=0
seymore, or someone with sql access to the message board can we get a
update msg_board set text=replace(text,'marp.retrogames.com','replay.marpirc.net');
on the message board messages?
It's been quite a while since I did much of anything on the marp site, but yes it does seem a lot faster here than I remembered it on ZTNet.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
Sorry for the downtime folks, and thanks for all the offers of hosting.
I went for seymour's kind offer in the end, and it seems to be working just great. Thanks Chris! The new site is at http://replay.marpirc.net/ though the old address will also take you there for now.
Nothing should have been lost in the migration - I shut the old site down a couple of days before the end of the month to make sure I was able to copy everything across properly. Please let me know if you notice anything that's not right yet. And update your bookmarks in case the retrogames.com URL stops working at some point.
Is it time for a new thread: 'The Official "marpirc.net Sucks" Thread'?
Chris.
I went for seymour's kind offer in the end, and it seems to be working just great. Thanks Chris! The new site is at http://replay.marpirc.net/ though the old address will also take you there for now.
Nothing should have been lost in the migration - I shut the old site down a couple of days before the end of the month to make sure I was able to copy everything across properly. Please let me know if you notice anything that's not right yet. And update your bookmarks in case the retrogames.com URL stops working at some point.
Is it time for a new thread: 'The Official "marpirc.net Sucks" Thread'?

Chris.
Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
The 9999 limit never worked anyway did it? For a few months I thought the MARP scripts were down before, all I ever got when viewing uploads was 'out of memory'... Took me a while to realise why that was happening, but it was because the cookie was set to request half the databaseLN2 wrote:sweet...maybe on the search page instead of the 9999 limit make the max default 500. I can't see someone even wanting 500 really...but it allows for flexibility. I look at either 50 or 100. Recently I redid my system so made new cookies. On doing so, the default uploads would crash on me. I went to the search page and found 9999 results as my default "default" value. I changed that to 100 and the uploads worked again.
just a thought as MARP looks forward...default defaults for new users or old users making new cookies etc.

Re: The Official "ZTNet Sucks" Thread
it does work on the new site though....what a waste of resources to download 9999.
it was set as that for my new cookie.
I realized this when I clicked the loads and after about 30 seconds realized it likely was transferring 9999.
I changed it to 100 for myself.
given activity at MARP nowadays, 50 likely ok too.
it was set as that for my new cookie.
I realized this when I clicked the loads and after about 30 seconds realized it likely was transferring 9999.
I changed it to 100 for myself.
given activity at MARP nowadays, 50 likely ok too.