N°1 score to disqualify ?

[sawys]

Hi

Just a few words to say that current n°1 score of fantzn2 doesn't respect actual rules (inp recorded with mame and not wolfmame) even if this score or the others are not very high

http://marp.retrogames.com/r/fantzn2
http://marp.retrogames.com/inp/e/e/4/33 ... win126.zip

I suggest to invite alkor33 to submit a new inp recorded with wolfmame.

Cheers.

[Chad]

noted and moded

[destructor]

Some shinobi's scores are not noted and moded still.

[Chad]

noted and moded, now :)

[Zhorik]

If we're actually going to start going in and zeroing scores that violate the "WolfMAME required for new 1sts" rule, I mentioned some awhile ago in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=9&t=14421&p=48515#p48515

5/1/2008 - rohga2 - SPELUNKER - o37b16 - DDEmeMAME ASM 0.37b19.81 Type-62.
5/1/2008 - rohga1 - SPELUNKER - o37b16 - DDEmeMAME ASM 0.37b19.81 Type-50.
4/28/2008 - stonebal - JoseLuis - tgmame66 - inp record with Alphamame32 0.66
1/26/2008 - passht4b - Phil Lamat - mame36 - Very old version used because of bad graphics displayed in later versions
1/6/2008 - rohga - SPELUNKER - o37b16 - recording: DDEmeMAME ASM 0.37b19.81 Type-63.
11/1/2007 - galaga3 - Gaplus - mame120 - [claimed wolf120, it's not -br]
10/12/2007 - sfa3 - gipson - win64 - [advertised 5 but mame64 doesn't appear to playback this recording.]
9/3/2007 - samsho - njh - win61

Phil's passht4b replay's probably ok since he mentions in the description that bad graphics are displayed in later versions.

-George

[Chad]

http://marp.retrogames.com/r/stonebal

alphamame is ok for stoneball... can you provide marp links to entries when making editing requests?

[Phil Lamat]

Phil's passht4b replay's probably ok since he mentions in the description that bad graphics are displayed in later versions.-George

Yes, that's incredible, but as far as I know mame36 is the more recent version which supports correctly passht4b !
If you find another version more recent, let me know, I'll be glad to upload something better (not so hard).
In the meantime, I thought this case could be an exception to rule 3b, but if anybody think I have to zero it, well, let me know and I will.