Rick, should this techique be banned at MARP in your opinion?LN2 wrote:Here is the key to score high on this game.
I had figured it out so it's likely the same strategy the WR holder used.
I did it one day "accidentally" in playing with a full swing hit that was like a bunt and figured...whoa, I can repeat this over and over again by bunting.
My personal using the below technique was around 600k.
It does take good timing to maintain though.
Ok....get baserunners on 1st and 3rd with less than 2 outs. This generally is not difficult in the first 2 innings. In later innings it can be very difficult to setup. If you don't get it setup in the first 2 innings, quit and start a new game.
Now for the next batter, BUNT(as JTC pictured above!)...and start your runners!
The fielder will throw to home plate to try and get the runner coming from 3rd base.(if there were 2 outs, then the fielder just throws to first base for the last out)
So you for a moment redirect your runner back toward 3rd once the ball is on the way home...then the catcher then throw toward second base to try and get your other runner.
Then immediately send your 3rd base runner back toward home once that ball is on the way back toward second.
The throw to second base to try and get your other runner is too late...runner safe. Then the second basemen throws home to try and get your other runner again. At this point, send your runner, who is now standing at second base, toward third.
The throw is too late to get the runner at home plate...then the catcher throws to third base...again too late....runner safe.
All runners safe....1 run scored...still have 1st and 3rd base runners.
repeat indefinitely.
JTC, I think for this bounty challenge this technique can't be allowed.
it is a gray area for TG...although a couple years ago when we discussed this I could not remember the exact details of this tehcnique...but now I suddenly do. hehe
Have fun with it!
Is this style of play:
Using a game "bug" for indefinite, easy leeching.
Not playing the game as it was intended.
?
(Weehawk, I'd rather have this disussion in this thread than regulation forum, thanks)