Yes, you understood it correctdestructor wrote:I'm for A:
A)Removing ALL splits would still enable players to play different tracks(because there are usually so many clones), it just would be upto their choosing.
I don't think there will be popular demand on canceling racing game splits... and a vote for that wouldn't pass anyway.Des wrote: This rule use for race games too. No 'courses games' splits.
None of the racing games has so many splits as Golden Tee series does.
------------
Yes, on the other hand I understand golf splits by track, on the other hand I'm not sure if difference between tracks is so big gameplay-wise to justify splits. (Or how big is the gamplay difference between golden tee 97 and 98)
But main point is that line has to be drawn somewhere. Just look at the golden tee list at my previous post...That just ain't good for the competition.
That would be one way to go, and probably Pat has usually gone with that rule...But what if one game has 100 different hall of fame entrys...and similar game has no hall of fame at all...Sawys wrote:I repeat that if the game shows different hall of fame then split the game like the score is stored in the board.
Assumably they have had fun doing that, and hopefully they have learned to master the game to make it on the top on remaining marp entrys.Sawys wrote:i noticed that gerhard and welby made competition - almost 480 scores posted from 28-12-2004 till 19-09-2005) you think in changing the rules.
Finally, I'd like to say that if A or B will be chosen, then there will still be loads of golden tee marp entrys to compete at. :)