Benchmarks
Moderators: mahlemiut, seymour, QRS
not even looking at those, looking at the slow ones, mrdriller 30% faster, cotton2 40% faster... 2.0 M faster than 3.2 p4 using official mame89 comparison, M might be better or the P4 might just be skipping instructions (what a thing to do in a processor) but i think it's more than just clock speed here.
Last edited by Chad on Thu Dec 30, 2004 8:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-skito
Different architecture, advanced branch prediction, dedicated stack management, optimized L2 cache and lots of other stuff I don't understand
. Plenty of info and benchmarks if you google eg. http://www.gamepc.com/labs/view_content ... top&page=1.
And the CPU speed is dynamically adjustable which is fun. I keep it on low or auto when surfing which also reduces fan noise and saves battery life and put it on full power when I need it eg. for gaming.
2Ghz is the fastest P-M available at the moment, 2.1Ghz has been announced.
One thing missing in the benchmark is resolution though, this may explain some inconsistencies. Everyone runs the benchmark in their own desktop resolution (-noswitchres -noswitchbpp). Better to specify a fixed resolution like -res 1024x768x32.
Gaz

And the CPU speed is dynamically adjustable which is fun. I keep it on low or auto when surfing which also reduces fan noise and saves battery life and put it on full power when I need it eg. for gaming.
2Ghz is the fastest P-M available at the moment, 2.1Ghz has been announced.
One thing missing in the benchmark is resolution though, this may explain some inconsistencies. Everyone runs the benchmark in their own desktop resolution (-noswitchres -noswitchbpp). Better to specify a fixed resolution like -res 1024x768x32.
Gaz
Last edited by LordGaz on Thu Dec 30, 2004 9:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If I were buying a PC right now, I'd probably be looking for an Athlon64 - but would be best used with a 64-bit compile of Linux, or an x86-64 version of Windows XP - whenever Microsoft finishes it.
From my memory of Pentium-Ms, a 1.6GHz CPU is roughly equivalent to about a 2.8GHz P4. Which is about equivalent to my current AthlonXP 3000+, depending on what you're doing.
From my memory of Pentium-Ms, a 1.6GHz CPU is roughly equivalent to about a 2.8GHz P4. Which is about equivalent to my current AthlonXP 3000+, depending on what you're doing.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer

MARP Assistant Web Maintainer

i'm a computer scientist but i'm not an electornic engineer, though i believe the problem is that fast electrons make to much energy thus even though you are cooling things down close to 0 Kelvin you're really just maintaining stability in the metal to keep the circuits from melting when cpus run that fast. But, i'm sure you're right there's got to be somethings in the computer/mobo other than the cpu's that can't operate in such cold environments.
-skito
- AL
- MARP Seer
- Posts: 682
- Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 11:15 pm
- Location: A pub or an off-licence in Dublin , Ireland .
- Contact:
re....
My PC clapped out last week. I took it apart and looked for stuff I wouldn't know how to find. My PC is a @18months old. I panicked. Rang a few people. Turns out the power supply box thingy had stopped working, which according to my mates is a rare occurence. Got a new one, cost 37 Euro, and PC was fixed in minutes. Phew.
And me mate did all the work, cos I have a Nitric Acid burn on my hand which I am milking.......heh.
As for Liquid Nitrogen, the man to ask is Rick.
Cheers,
AL
And me mate did all the work, cos I have a Nitric Acid burn on my hand which I am milking.......heh.
As for Liquid Nitrogen, the man to ask is Rick.
Cheers,
AL
HAL: " It's puzzling . I've never seen anything quite like this before..? "
Hi all, here are my benchmarks...
WolfMAME 0.92
AMD AthlonXP 2800+
1024MB DDR400 RAM
256MB AtiRadeon 9600
Windows 2000 Pro SP4
Res. 1024x768x32
Pacman: 1166.669fps
Malzak: 1057.308fps
Double Dragon: 229.566fps
Twinbee Yahhoo! (Konami GX): 245.665fps
STUN Runner: 141.688fps
Mr Driller (Namco System 12): 36.515fps
Tekken (Namco System 11): 68.027fps
Cotton 2 (Sega ST-V): 27.896fps
Space Invaders: 1967.842fps
Puzz Loop (Kaneko SuperNova): 70.433fps
WolfMAME 0.92
AMD AthlonXP 2800+
1024MB DDR400 RAM
256MB AtiRadeon 9600
Windows 2000 Pro SP4
Res. 1024x768x32
Pacman: 1166.669fps
Malzak: 1057.308fps
Double Dragon: 229.566fps
Twinbee Yahhoo! (Konami GX): 245.665fps
STUN Runner: 141.688fps
Mr Driller (Namco System 12): 36.515fps
Tekken (Namco System 11): 68.027fps
Cotton 2 (Sega ST-V): 27.896fps
Space Invaders: 1967.842fps
Puzz Loop (Kaneko SuperNova): 70.433fps
/ Eduardo Yáñez Parareda (eyp) /
P4 2,4GHz
512MB
Geforce MX440 64MB DDR AGP
Win XP Pro SP2
*********************************
P4 3.0GHz HT
1GB PC-2700
Radeon 9600
Win XP Pro SP2
512MB
Geforce MX440 64MB DDR AGP
Win XP Pro SP2
Code: Select all
WOLF92
pacman---377.063688
malzak---350.159595
ddragon--133.175742
tbyahhoo-152.223074
stunrun-- 83.264909
mrdrillr- 37.065697
cotton2-- 20.754700
invaders-458.111550
suplup--- 38.596419
Code: Select all
MAME97u3
swtrilgy---6,701999
P4 3.0GHz HT
1GB PC-2700
Radeon 9600
Win XP Pro SP2
Code: Select all
MAME97u3
swtrilgy---9,448501
P4 3.2GHz
512MB RAM PC-3200
X300-SE 128MB
80GB
WinXP Pro
512MB RAM PC-3200
X300-SE 128MB
80GB
WinXP Pro
Code: Select all
SWTRILOGY (mame97u3)
Average FPS: 9.870677 (5000 frames)
- Attachments
-
- bench.zip
- swtrilgy bench.bat
- (269 Bytes) Downloaded 775 times
new benchmark batch for mame100
since they removed the skip_disclaimer option the old benchmark script doesn't work, but this one should (swtrilgy included but rem/commented out for brevity). To run unzip to mame dir and run benchall.
cpu = amd mp1800+
graphics = nvidia gf3 ti200 64m
os = xp
Benchmarking installaiton procedure: unzip benchmarker.zip into a directory where you can access mame.exe (it may or may not work with wolfmame but you'll have to rename the mame executable you use to mame.exe or change the name in the script), then cd to that directory and type benchall.bat and watch the pretty fps come up between gamenames.
cpu = amd mp1800+
graphics = nvidia gf3 ti200 64m
os = xp
Code: Select all
Game mame100
________________________________________________________________
pacman 475.5
malzak 651.6
ddragon 139.8
tbyahhoo 130.1
stunrun 84.9
mrdrillr 23.2
tekken 42.4
cotton2 14.0
invaders 594.0
suplup 43.2
- Attachments
-
- benchmarker.zip
- (551 Bytes) Downloaded 671 times
-skito
cpu=amd 4000 1ML2
vid=6600 GT
os=xp
mode a=800x600x16 b=1280x1024x32 c=1280x1024x16
so how am i not gettting 60fps on mrdriller? darn. i don't have latest nvidia drivers but that shouldn't make a difference. could it be the l2?
vid=6600 GT
os=xp
mode a=800x600x16 b=1280x1024x32 c=1280x1024x16
so how am i not gettting 60fps on mrdriller? darn. i don't have latest nvidia drivers but that shouldn't make a difference. could it be the l2?
Code: Select all
Game mame101a mame101b mame81
________________________________________________________________
pacman 1564.7 880.1 1095.2
malzak 1282.3 969.5 1060.7
ddragon 314.8 313.3 321.3
tbyahhoo 316.8 314.0 352.0
stunrun 180.2 175.9 175.6
mrdrillr 39.7 38.3 43.9
tekken 73.4 71.3 82.1
cotton2 23.9 23.8 39.0
invaders 1749.9 951.4 1146.5
suplup 76.1 74.6
-skito