[POLL] MULTIPLE BUTTON MAPPING (take2)
Moderator: BBH
MARP username: gastrainga
My votes:
1. YES
2. YES (Although I would support special rules on a few games: e.g. Assault, Crazy Climber)
3. YES
-gastrainga
PS - asn007's vote on rule 3 don't make sense. I think he got confused, since it doesn't make sense to vote no on rule 2 and then no on rule 3 (actually if you vote no on rule 2, rule 3 becomes moot).
My votes:
1. YES
2. YES (Although I would support special rules on a few games: e.g. Assault, Crazy Climber)
3. YES
-gastrainga
PS - asn007's vote on rule 3 don't make sense. I think he got confused, since it doesn't make sense to vote no on rule 2 and then no on rule 3 (actually if you vote no on rule 2, rule 3 becomes moot).
Please note that if both rules 2 and 3 are added, we would have to find a way to distinguish buttons remapping from directions remapping, which seems a bit... odd.
I mean, if we are going to ban remapping lets ban it completely (except for remapping just to change keys, as Patwos said) .
1. YES
2. YES
3. NO
(MARP username: MJS)
I mean, if we are going to ban remapping lets ban it completely (except for remapping just to change keys, as Patwos said) .
1. YES
2. YES
3. NO
(MARP username: MJS)
-
- Button Slapper
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sun May 04, 2003 5:15 pm
- MasterDave69
- Button Slapper
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Apr 04, 2004 3:30 am
- Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Marp username = Sawys@jvrm.net
1 - NO
2 - NO
3 - NO cos it's useless to precise it !
[Edit] Ok, now i vote NO for it cos it seems that you suspect that everyone is a cheater
1 - NO
2 - NO
3 - NO cos it's useless to precise it !
[Edit] Ok, now i vote NO for it cos it seems that you suspect that everyone is a cheater
Last edited by sawys on Wed Apr 06, 2005 4:20 am, edited 1 time in total.
Sawys is Sébastien GIRAUD, admin of MAMESCORE, member of MARP, TWIN GALAXIES, RETRO UPRISING and ex-member of JVRM
Then I can inform you that we can detect it... with our knowledge. Maybe you should inform yourself about that before you vote? Do you really think we should try and enforce such a rule if we did not have the abillity to check it? Regardless of that, should you not vote for the option that you feel is right instead of taking the option that fits your "knowledge" ? Yes or no is of course up to you but I fear when people vote and have no idea what they are talking about... seriouslly. No offense, but that is not a good thing.sawys wrote:Marp username = Sawys@jvrm.net
1 - NO
2 - NO
3 - NO cos it's useless to precise it !
I vote NO for all cos i think it's impossible to detect to my knowledge and it seems that you suspect that everyone is a cheater
ps:Don't take this as personal flame or likewise. I just want to expand your knowledge a bit
QRS