Special rules say:
So shouldn't all the scores be zeroed/deleted (except Gerhard's score)?You must use MAME 0.75 or later for this game - its emulation was incorrect before, causing stuck balls [er...] which gives easy points.
Moderator: BBH
So shouldn't all the scores be zeroed/deleted (except Gerhard's score)?You must use MAME 0.75 or later for this game - its emulation was incorrect before, causing stuck balls [er...] which gives easy points.
Done, all scores other than gerhard's have been zeroed.diabolik wrote: So shouldn't all the scores be zeroed/deleted (except Gerhard's score)?
Still bitter, are we?LN2 wrote:yep..there are easily 100+ cases like this on the MARP scoreboard now...where new rules were adopted yet replays violating the rule still remain unzeroed.
Also, at least 10-15 macmame replays I had reviewed and requested through a forum post(s) to be zeroed out due to rules violations or couldn't get it to playback successfully have not been zeroed.
not sure where you see that in my above post...BBH wrote:Still bitter, are we?
nah... I did assume though given there are at least 10-20+ macmame cases of this, that there are 5-10 times as many PC cases.100+ cases... me thinks somebody has a tendency to inflate things just a tad.
Perhaps, but Chad had established for macmame since I was essentially the only confirmer for macmame replays that only one person needed to not be able to properly play it back etc.As for the macmame recordings, perhaps they weren't zeroed since it's common courtesy not to do that until at least three different people report of problems with the recording.
I totally agree...but when 90% of my postings for zeroing scores didn't get addressed yet 90+% of PC requests get addressed...I think that goes beyond stuff just slipping through.We're only human, and don't spend every waking moment of our lives waiting to edit scores on MARP. Sometimes things slip though, or we assume somebody else is going to do it. So post a reminder and don't be an ass about it.
That's what your post comes off as after the not-so-subtle dig you made towards MARP over at Twin Galaxies.LN2 wrote:not sure where you see that in my above post...BBH wrote:Still bitter, are we?
So wait. What exactly are you referring to here?nah... I did assume though given there are at least 10-20+ macmame cases of this, that there are 5-10 times as many PC cases.100+ cases... me thinks somebody has a tendency to inflate things just a tad.
BBH wrote:So wait. What exactly are you referring to here?
There are 10-20+ macmame cases of individual games where recordings are in violation of the special rules, like bombbee?
Or 10-20+ recordings with playback problems? Those are two very different things.
LN2 wrote:..there are easily 100+ cases like this on the MARP scoreboard now...where new rules were adopted yet replays violating the rule still remain unzeroed.
Please, let's not get caught up in the semantics that BBH wants to do here.Chad wrote:90% of your posts were ignored? i think not.
As Weehawk repeated my quote above, my comment here wasn't focusing on playbackability, but replays which should be zeroed due to rules violations.I might have missed one of your postings but i usually get at least 90% (including the macmame ones i thought?) of the playbackability posts and edit/check them.
It's been 6-12+ months since these. I also am not talking about a brief period of time here...but from replays I was watching for the purpose of confirming for the MARP scoreboard that I did over about a 1 year period off and on.please show links to the 90% of the posts i didn't get to.
No, I was only posting why I don't participate at MARP for now. A topic was started by others. I only took part in that discussion.BBH wrote:That's what your post comes off as after the not-so-subtle dig you made towards MARP over at Twin Galaxies.
bombbee...sure.There are 10-20+ macmame cases of individual games where recordings are in violation of the special rules, like bombbee?