No Olympic System as described in the llink give :Barthax wrote:1-1-1 structured (example at http://marp.retrogames.com/olympic.txt )
A) 2-0-0
B) 1-0-1
C) 0-1-1
D) 0-0-0
A) 2-0-0-0
B) 1-0-1-0
C) 0-1-1-0
D) 0-0-0-2
It's not the same because all places below 3rd are counted.
Beside I've think of another system :
Points will be given by the number of record for a game.
Exemples :
Game A (only 1 record)
Player 1 : 1 point
Game B (3 records)
Player 1 : 3 points
Player 2 : 2 points
Player 3 : 1 point
Game C (25 records)
Player 1 : 25 points
Player 2 : 24 points
Player 3 : 23 points
---
Player 25 : 1 point
Advantages :
- Popular games give more points (its harder to have 1st place in popular games)
- little scores will be always in the last positions, give only few points.
- It's no score-related. A very high score (as those of the great guys of Team2ch) don't kill competition on these games
- All scores will be counted
- New games grant only few points for the speed guys who want to have 100 points with little effort in the current system.
Inconvenients :
It's possible and strange to gain points without make anything because someone post a new score lower than mine.
It don't kill ABCuploaders (me ?) even if it lowered the interest to post little scores for points
Remember, the perfect system don't exist.
Maybe I missed something, but I haven't see a topic for suggest LB systems. Strange when we want to make a major change.
Any comments for my system are welcomed
Francois
