tar's Saturn recording

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

Should tar's Saturn leeching be banned?

Poll ended at Mon Aug 18, 2003 5:58 am

Yep
18
72%
Nope
7
28%
 
Total votes: 25

LN2
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 pm

Post by LN2 »

dskys wrote:No, I didn't. And, as I said/tried to say, my basis for voting no is not particular to this game or any game and thus watching it or watching inp38DD isn't relevant to MY viewpoint on leeching. I still stand by it IN SOME RESPECTS, but accept that, on MARP, it's probably not the way to do things.
Well, this poll and your vote IS PARTICULAR to this game.

There are many types of leeching. We aren't applying this to leeching overall..just THIS game. There are actually many games where leeching isn't as ridiculous as it is in this case that have easily been banned. There are other leeching techniques...like that in Toki...that are still allowed here.

For this game, you do a little move and get in the right spot then just sit there..firing. I didn't save a screenshot of it....perhaps that would be easier for those too lazy to watch the inp before voting. You don't have to ever move again. You don't even have to time your shots it seems. You could turn it over to your pet dog and have the dog keep his paws on the right keys/buttons and the dog can set a high score for this game. As mentioned above you could put weights on the keys to hold them down then walk away...score keeps accumulating. Yeah, a high score where you weren't even at the game 99.99% of the time. That's nice.

This poll is for an exception to the general MARP rules of play.
You shouldn't vote without knowing what specifically is being talked about...which you obviously don't for this poll...yet you voted no anyway.

Thx a bunch. I hope the ban wins cuz otherwise I think we will lose score tracking for this game. I would hope editors would archive this game if the ban doesn't pass. I know I never would bother playing the game.

I can't believe 6 people actually want to allow this type of bogus play for a high score competition. I wonder if any of the 6 watched it before voting no. tar is one of them I guess that did watch it...cuz he played it...hehe He just wants the cheap leaderboard points.

tar, if this isn't banned then within a week or so someone will have a 24-48+ hour run uploaded doing that leech....so you will lose the leaderboard points anyway....so not sure what motivation you even have for voting no.
User avatar
Weehawk
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2562
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:43 am
Location: Devil's Canyon
Contact:

Post by Weehawk »

LN2 wrote:You could turn it over to your pet dog and have the dog keep his paws on the right keys/buttons and the dog can set a high score for this game
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Stop it...you're killing me.

Well, if nothing else it's made for an interesting thread. Thanks tar.
John Cunningham (JTC)
Image
User avatar
dskys
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by dskys »

:(

My vote would have been no WHATEVER game. When I voted I felt that it should be all or nothing. I can leech in Arkanoid2, why can't he?

I wonder how many of the people that voted even play the fckin game/care about how the score is achieved? I'm assuming many voters saw the word 'leech' and instinctively pressed yes to ban it just as i pressed no to let leeching stay.

I'm not trying to cause an arguement but just because I feel any techniques (aka arcade conditions) should be allowed??? (see HS thread :P) doesn't mean I don't see it from the other point of view. But if voting no is unbelievable, why put the fckin option in the poll in the first place!!?

The only way all games are on a level playing field is to allow everything. i know that's not acceptable, i'm not daft, but that doesn't mean that a small group of people who get pleasure out of cheating a high score can't carry on their little trick imo.

After all there are another 3500+ games where leeching isn't an option....
#Find another way to me
Find another way and make me free
Then you hear my voice 'don't find another wayyyyy'
Oh i've cried for you, please follow me oh follow meee
User avatar
BBH
Editor
Posts: 1585
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 7:06 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Post by BBH »

I didn't vote until I watched the recording in question to see what it was all about and if the leeching was really that bad. It was worse than I thought. One vote can make a big difference here, it's a big responsibility so I think anyone taking the time to vote should at least attempt to educate themselves on the matter first. It's a shame you didn't.

P.S. You didn't answer my hypothetical questions, dskys.
BBH wrote:Let's say there's a trick/glitch in Hyper Sports which makes the required height on Pole Vault 0.00m. And it never goes up, it stays at 0.00m. It would obviously require practically no skill to stay on the event forever and keep getting points here. Would you accept that? Would you think it's an acceptable way to play the game for competition? Do you think that would show who has the most skill at the game?
User avatar
tar
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 9:25 am
Location: ohio u.s.a.

Post by tar »

Of course a factor of 0.00m would be stupid to bother with playing.
In that case the game (hyper sports) should have a warning on the startup to tell you it does not work properly. Zero points. Unless it was a glitch that may have taken some amount of intelligence to discover. :idea: Actually I sent this saturn bug in on a score of 115,000 two months ago...
along with this little gem of a game that is in the same category of question as Saturn and Cosmic Chasm. Check it out.

http://marp.retrogames.com/inp/4/0/5/ta ... n36b15.zip Image
User avatar
JoustGod
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 170
Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2002 8:03 am
Location: Las Vegas, Nevada, USA

Post by JoustGod »

dskys wrote::(


I'm not trying to cause an arguement but just because I feel any techniques (aka arcade conditions) should be allowed??? (see HS thread :P) doesn't mean I don't see it from the other point of view. But if voting no is unbelievable, why put the fckin option in the poll in the first place!!?

The only way all games are on a level playing field is to allow everything. i know that's not acceptable, i'm not daft, but that doesn't mean that a small group of people who get pleasure out of cheating a high score can't carry on their little trick imo.

After all there are another 3500+ games where leeching isn't an option....
It would help if you quit lumping everything into one basket. While some games can have valid point/counterpoint, this particular case is not one of those. This particular method/leech/trick/etc. requires virtually zero skill level while others that you mention require far more. That doesn't sound like the "level playing field" that you want everything to be. It's not going to happen as so many games involve vastly different approaches in respects to gameplay and what can or cannot be achieved because of programming quirks that allow this kind of leech to be exploited infinitely.

The option to allow the leech in the poll is merely to put democracy in action. I guess we figured that most MARPers could spot this as a bad precedence a mile away. I guess we may have figured wrong as I still am waiting for a valid reason to have MARP OK a technique that takes the "A" out of "MARP". Endless looping in this particular case hardly constitutes "action".

Don't confuse leeching with arcade conditions. Just because a certain thing can be done doesn't mean it has a place in a competitive enviroment such as TG or MARP. If you want to exploit a game flaw, knock yourself out. Just try to understand that you are not displaying much in the way of skill with certain techniques (..and in this case, Saturn, the display of skill is about as close to zero as I've seen in a while). Thus, you will receive little respect from your peers if you continue to pursue this course.
User avatar
tar
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1209
Joined: Mon Aug 05, 2002 9:25 am
Location: ohio u.s.a.

Post by tar »

joustgod said
as so many games involve vastly different approaches in respects to gameplay and what can or cannot be achieved because of programming quirks
What about my Treasurehunt recording?
1st place, 100 points , green score.
LN2
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 pm

Post by LN2 »

dskys wrote:My vote would have been no WHATEVER game. When I voted I felt that it should be all or nothing. I can leech in Arkanoid2, why can't he?
That's not even close to being the same as this case. In arkanoid even if you try and leech, you still have to have skill in keeping the ball in play...and are at a risk of losing your vaus. You must physically still play the game...and odds are eventually the ball will hit that last block somewhere you were trying to avoid and get you to the next round anyway. How can you compare that to an infinite leech where if you put things on your keys to hold them down you can just walk away and let it go?
I wonder how many of the people that voted even play the fckin game/care about how the score is achieved?
if they could careless then they shouldn't vote. it's that simple. Voters for these polls should be those that care...not those trying to enforce stupid political type crap on all of MARP....instead of looking at the particular case.
I'm assuming many voters saw the word 'leech' and instinctively pressed yes to ban it just as i pressed no to let leeching stay.
You likely are correct there are a couple that perhaps did this....but it's cuz from reading a few of these posts they clearly understand just how ridiculous this leech "trick" is so it should be banned.

Any leech that makes high scores for a game totally pointless should be banned. It shouldn't even require a vote IMHO but here we are...cuz MARP rules are important we are voting on it anyway. it's a shame given a good number here just toss their vote without really looking at what they are voting for.
because I feel any techniques (aka arcade conditions) should be allowed???
Well, when it makes the high score totally pointless, why should that technique continue to be allowed? If you allow it, then your high score whether you used the trick or not will be pointless. That's a shame to someone who really is skilled at playing the game. All the high scores for it would just be using the lame leeching technique. Someone down in 10th place with what looks like a crappy score would actually be the best skilled player at the game. Is that fair? of course not...

I am like many here saying inps of that sort are perhaps WELCOME here...but on the tricks page....or submitted as a "0" score with a description just saying it demonstrates a cool leeching trick. It shouldn't be submitted as a score for the scoreboard.
(see HS thread :P) doesn't mean I don't see it from the other point of view. But if voting no is unbelievable, why put the fckin option in the poll in the first place!!?
cuz as I said above...it's a MARP rule to have a poll to ban stuff that goes against the general rules. I think in this case the poll is phrased backwards... I hope the editors realize this.

The general rule as QRS quoted above doesn't allow this type of leeching. So the vote should really be if you want to make an exception to this rule and allow the leeching in this case. Why does this angle make a difference? Well, because of another MARP rule which requires 2/3rds in favor of the action.

In this case because of how the question was phrased we need 2/3rds to approve ot banning this leeching technique that by the general rules of play is actually already banned IMHO. Something isn't quite right there. It should be taking 2/3rds vote to allow this leeching...instead of 2/3rds to ban this leeching.

I think the 2/3rds thing is going too far anyway. As dsys has pointed out, some just vote yes/no without really reviewing the info for the actual poll. if you get even just a few doing that then cuz of the 2/3rds requirement as we see here in an obvious case where it should be banned it is barely passing at this point.

Personally, I always delay my vote for a couple days after the poll starts to see the points others bring up about it in the thread.
The only way all games are on a level playing field is to allow everything.
Not at all.... do you play monopoly with the same set of rules as you play Chess? cmon...they are 2 totally different games. Arcade games vary tons and are totally different also....so of course each can have it's own set of rules. What makes each game a "level playing field" is that everyone playing that particular game are playing it by the same set of rules.

That's all this poll is about...setting a rule to ban on that leeching technique for THIS game. It won't apply to any other games.

Did you even look at the scores for Saturn? It has scores going back a few years that are all 100k or less. Based on that without really playing the game myself it seems a reasonable score for someone reasonably skilled at the game is around 75-100k. tar finds this leech trick and posts 1 million. He could have just as easily posted 10 million if he had it go overnight while he was SLEEPING. Then John C. posts a score just a tad higher to make the point himself. 20+ of us could easily do that same thing for this game....each of us beating the previous #1 score by just a tad.

What's that add up to? It becomes totally pointless to track the scores if that is allowed. You might as well zero them all out....archive the game.
Instead of doing that making a special rule so you can actually compete for high scores again for this game makes sense.
User avatar
dskys
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by dskys »

Fair enough. No point me commenting further.
#Find another way to me
Find another way and make me free
Then you hear my voice 'don't find another wayyyyy'
Oh i've cried for you, please follow me oh follow meee
User avatar
dskys
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by dskys »

BBH wrote:I didn't vote until I watched the recording in question to see what it was all about and if the leeching was really that bad. It was worse than I thought. One vote can make a big difference here, it's a big responsibility so I think anyone taking the time to vote should at least attempt to educate themselves on the matter first. It's a shame you didn't.

P.S. You didn't answer my hypothetical questions, dskys.
BBH wrote:Let's say there's a trick/glitch in Hyper Sports which makes the required height on Pole Vault 0.00m. And it never goes up, it stays at 0.00m. It would obviously require practically no skill to stay on the event forever and keep getting points here. Would you accept that? Would you think it's an acceptable way to play the game for competition? Do you think that would show who has the most skill at the game?

Yeah, i missed your q.

before i answer i've said (although not outright) that since the vote/discussion my views have changed. After all there's no point discussing if i'm not going to listen to both sides. Apart from me however, 5 other people voted no - would be nice to hear their views?
I'm happy for it to be banned though, but i'll prolly do a poll on Arkanoid2 in the future :)

As for the question, you ask it knowing full well what my answer would be - only a fool would say allow it. However, if it was an easter egg, placed in the game specifically by the programmers, i think it's unfair to ban the technique, which brings the whole arguement full circle. The question as it stands, no, i wouldnt be happy, but what if it only happened on round5? No one gets that far, and if someone did and the trick opened up, fckin go for it!
It takes a lot of skill to get that far (and no one on here has - i dont know about the official world record) and in that case i wouldnt have a prob with it.

I know that makes me a lil hypocritical (cos it implies that if the leech was 1st round i'd be miffed hehe) but each case on it's own merits as so many people have said. (and hence why my general standpoint on leeching has pretty much changed)

I know this won't happen, and feel free to give me 1001 reasons why, but there are only a hanful of games that have definate leeching spots for which no rules are in place. Why not (when a leech is dicovered) split the game into two - one that allows the leech (maybe for tedium value) and one that doesn't - for traditional MARP value?

adi
#Find another way to me
Find another way and make me free
Then you hear my voice 'don't find another wayyyyy'
Oh i've cried for you, please follow me oh follow meee
LN2
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 1669
Joined: Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:46 pm

Post by LN2 »

dskys, stop making up other hypotheticals or other types of leeching that perhaps are allowed here. This case is totally separate.

Are you trying to confuse others what this poll is really about hoping to get more no votes?

I think the current vote tally for this poll...vs others like the NVRAM poll for Hyper Sports...show just how odd some gamers are here and inconsistent in their thinking and logic for rules.

I would have expected the voting to be the other way around...where for this game you have 13 say ban it and 1-2 say allow it...while for NVRAM for Hyper Sports it being a pretty close vote cuz with the arguments for both sides I could have voted either way really. I'm amazed how 1-sided the NVRAM vote is going yet we have this leeching vote close.

That doesn't fit the "allow anything and everything to get as high of a score as possible" case you are trying to make dskys.
User avatar
dskys
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 233
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2003 4:40 pm
Location: Manchester, UK

Post by dskys »

i havent made further hyperthetical scenarios? I also said that due to several comments my views on this and on how i will vote in general in future have changed.

IM not trying to cloud anything, i posted saying no further comment necessary (ie i agreed!) and then saw the question :)

cheers
#Find another way to me
Find another way and make me free
Then you hear my voice 'don't find another wayyyyy'
Oh i've cried for you, please follow me oh follow meee
User avatar
Q.T.Quazar
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 10:14 am

Post by Q.T.Quazar »

I know this won't happen, and feel free to give me 1001 reasons why, but there are only a hanful of games that have definate leeching spots for which no rules are in place. Why not (when a leech is dicovered) split the game into two - one that allows the leech (maybe for tedium value) and one that doesn't - for traditional MARP value?
because we don't value the leech here. where is the skill in sitting still and simply pounding the fire button? what does it prove?

games that have a viably dangerous leeching point are often allowed to continue without restrictive rules at MARP. in cchasm1 and particularly in saturn it is quite clear that there is no danger.

I think the greatest flaw in LordGaz's argument is his use of the word 'mastery'. You don't master a game by exploiting its weakness. You master a game by beating it on its own terms. If you're in a fight with someone, and kick them in the nuts 20 times, you don't walk away from that fight saying you 'mastered' the other person, and that if someone else wants to prove their mastery they have to kick him in the nuts 21 times. No. You want to win the fight through a mixture of skill and honorable conduct, or else you haven't proven that you're the better fighter. You haven't proven anything other than you can swiftly take advantage of someone in a very cheap way. And everyone who watched the fight knows this.

*end analogy

And as for rules as to how to play a game, why not? Almost all sports on earth have governing bodies, and those bodies routinely make microrefinements (and sometimes not so micro) to the sport so that players and spectators enjoy the game more, or so that the game keeps up with current times. The most important thing in a competitive sport has always been, and will always be, to keep the spectator's interest. Leeching fails here. Sure it's interesting to watch someone use a trick in an arcade. For maybe two minutes. Then, sorry, I'm going to go watch the guy who is on mission Gamma of Cosmic Chasm, rather than Mission Alpha.

MARP's goal is to emulate the experience of "watching a virtual master play an arcade game"

I wrote this into the rules page long after getting in trouble with BeeJay for submitting on games that I obviously showed no degree of mastery over. The quote is verbatim of what he told me. He was right. I made sure it was the first statement with regards to recording. This is the code that we play by here. And nobody is going to watch an infinite leecher and consider them a master.
--------------
BrokenVaus--Q.T.Quazar's law of MAME: Any game I am good at will have something seriously f***ed with its emulation.
User avatar
Weehawk
MARPaholic
MARPaholic
Posts: 2562
Joined: Wed Jun 25, 2003 7:43 am
Location: Devil's Canyon
Contact:

Post by Weehawk »

LN2 wrote:The general rule as QRS quoted above doesn't allow this type of leeching. So the vote should really be if you want to make an exception to this rule and allow the leeching in this case. Why does this angle make a difference? Well, because of another MARP rule which requires 2/3rds in favor of the action.

In this case because of how the question was phrased we need 2/3rds to approve ot banning this leeching technique that by the general rules of play is actually already banned IMHO. Something isn't quite right there. It should be taking 2/3rds vote to allow this leeching...instead of 2/3rds to ban this leeching.
Whoa....I thought we were just looking for a simple majority here. It's not trying to change a standing rule, in fact as you point out an excellent argument could be made that to allow the technique is changing a standing rule. How the question is phrased doesn't alter that.

Pat, you want to clarify this?
John Cunningham (JTC)
Image
User avatar
Q.T.Quazar
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 377
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2003 10:14 am

Post by Q.T.Quazar »

actually, LN2 is precisely right.

this is why i suggested a long time ago, in a rather famous fight with Tommi (where I cancelled his vote), that only the RC or the Editors should have the right to call votes. not that regular MARPers can't have input into the construction of these votes, but that only the governing body have the right to actually *call* a vote. the community in general would be reponsible for peitioning the editors to do so.

the majority of that thread can be read here:

viewtopic.php?t=5393&highlight=voting+procedure

IMO, and as little offense is meant as possible, many of the votes at MARP have been set up in a sloppy manner--either not providing a clear picture of the situation, not being phrased properly, in ignorance of previous discussions/arguments at MARP, in ignorance of rules and policies at MARP, or showing bias towards the attainment of one outcome.
--------------
BrokenVaus--Q.T.Quazar's law of MAME: Any game I am good at will have something seriously f***ed with its emulation.
Post Reply