Mame 0.63

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

Post Reply
User avatar
Blost
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 123
Joined: Mon Mar 04, 2002 4:37 pm
Location: France

Mame 0.63

Post by Blost »

Looks like it's out...
http://www.mame.net/downmain.html
User avatar
mahlemiut
Editor
Posts: 4187
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 10:05 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by mahlemiut »

Please do all take note that this version will now create an nvram (as well as cfg, diff, and whatever else) folder for you. Isn't that helpful? :roll:
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Image
User avatar
QRS
Editor
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:33 pm
Location: Sweden

RE

Post by QRS »

...is there anything we can do about that Barry? To prevent mame from doing that I mean?
QRS
User avatar
LordGaz
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 5:07 pm
Location: London, UK

Re: Stopping MAME0.63 regenerating the nvram folder

Post by LordGaz »

:idea: How about creating a read only dummy file called 'nvram' and putting it in the MAME directory, would that work?
User avatar
BBH
Editor
Posts: 1584
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 7:06 am
Location: Portland, Oregon
Contact:

Post by BBH »

whatsnew.txt says it only applies to the win32 version... FUCK YEAH, DOS FOR LIFE BITCHEZZZZ!

(never mind the fact that there is no DOS binary up yet on mame.net) :(
User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat »

I agree with bbh : DOS !!
And I hope it is possible to have an alphamame63 DOS for t6 ... is it ?
Borjaquake
Button Slapper
Button Slapper
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Jan 14, 2003 9:27 am

Post by Borjaquake »

a very good solution LORDGAZ but i did it with each *.nv but your method is the best (directly make read-only a text file named nvram)
Last edited by Borjaquake on Tue Jan 14, 2003 1:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
LordGaz
MARP Knight
MARP Knight
Posts: 220
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 5:07 pm
Location: London, UK

Post by LordGaz »

Thanks Borjaquake. Let me clarify the method though, I typed that post very quickly last thing at night.

To prevent the nvram folder from recreating itself:

1. DELETE the nvram folder.
2. Open up notepad and save an empty text file inside the MAME directory.
3. Rename this file to 'nvram' without any extension, ie no .txt in the filename.

Now MAME can't create a new nvram folder because a file exists with the same name. Btw there's no need to change the read only attribute.
User avatar
QRS
Editor
Posts: 954
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2002 3:33 pm
Location: Sweden

RE

Post by QRS »

Thanks Gary! It works great!

QRS
QRS
User avatar
Dax
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Aloof

Post by Dax »

Maybe Im crazy

But don't the file types have to be the same in order for this to work. Creating a text file called nvram doesn't stop you(or Mame for that matter) from creating a folder called nvram in the same directory. Ive been trying to delete the nvram file in mame32 .63 and haven't had any luck yet. Now if I were to create a FOLDER called nvram. Mame wouldn't be able to overwrite it because you can't have two folders with the same name. However in this instance mame just uses the newly created nvram folder as the one it would have created. Just need a little more guidance. Thanks
User avatar
mahlemiut
Editor
Posts: 4187
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 10:05 pm
Location: New Zealand
Contact:

Post by mahlemiut »

I bet you have Windows set to not show file extensions. Enable the display of file extensions, and rename the file to 'nvram', not nvram.txt.

COPY CON NVRAM at a command prompt should work too.
- Barry Rodewald
MARP Assistant Web Maintainer
Image
User avatar
seymour
Site Admin
Posts: 241
Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2002 2:59 pm
Location: Newfoundland, Canada

Post by seymour »

mahlemiut wrote:I bet you have Windows set to not show file extensions. Enable the display of file extensions, and rename the file to 'nvram', not nvram.txt.

COPY CON NVRAM at a command prompt should work too.
COPY NUL NVRAM would work much better. Since you don't have to do anything else after typing the command (I forget offhand how to end the copy con thing, for it to actually write to the file).
Chris Gushue
MARP IRC/Forum Maintainer
http://gushue.net
User avatar
Dax
MARP Serf
MARP Serf
Posts: 184
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2003 8:03 am
Location: Aloof

Post by Dax »

Ahhhhh!!!!

I knew it was right under my nose. Mucho thanks Guys!!
Post Reply