Car Polo

Discussion about MARP's regulation play

Moderator: BBH

Post Reply

How to score this game

Poll ended at Wed Jul 24, 2002 4:53 pm

Goals
1
17%
Difference in score
5
83%
 
Total votes: 6

cosumel
Button Masher
Button Masher
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 12:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Car Polo

Post by cosumel »

Scoring? Straight score, or difference in score. In this game, the only good defense is a good offense. My suggestion is difference in score.
10 day poll expires 7/24
Ray
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers.
You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions." - Naguib Mahfouz
User avatar
roncli
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Contact:

Post by roncli »

[This is a close poll. :P --SarcasmCli]
-roncli
User avatar
Phil Lamat
Regulation Coordinator
Posts: 2076
Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2002 9:19 am

Post by Phil Lamat »

Why not : 10x(goals for) - goals against ?
It's already like that on Marp for games as otwalls or spiker, and IMO it is the best scoring
Frankie
Editor
Posts: 910
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 11:16 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Frankie »

Phil Lamat wrote:Why not : 10x(goals for) - goals against ?
It's already like that on Marp for games as otwalls or spiker, and IMO it is the best scoring
Yes, and the possibilty of a lot of draws is not that great using this method. Can a poll be restarted with more options?

Bye.
User avatar
roncli
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Contact:

Post by roncli »

Phil Lamat wrote:Why not : 10x(goals for) - goals against ?
Because it gives more credit for offense than defense. IMHO, that's bad. Both should be equal.

The poll's fine, IMHO.
-roncli
cosumel
Button Masher
Button Masher
Posts: 67
Joined: Wed Apr 17, 2002 12:29 am
Location: Pennsylvania

Post by cosumel »

I thought these were sufficient because there is only offense. Defense means getting your hands on the ball and trying to score.
Ray
"You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers.
You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions." - Naguib Mahfouz
User avatar
roncli
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Contact:

Post by roncli »

No, defense is your ability to prevent your opponent from scoring. Under that system, a 10-11 loss would be worth than a 1-0 win. :(
-roncli
Frankie
Editor
Posts: 910
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 11:16 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Frankie »

roncli wrote:No, defense is your ability to prevent your opponent from scoring. Under that system, a 10-11 loss would be worth than a 1-0 win. :(
Come on Roncli. We are talking about a little unrealistic game here. This is not Baseball. That scoring system was more or less taking in use to prevent a lot of ties on the highscore table. If we go by goals scored or goal difference which is even worse, we see a lot of these ties. I think that should be stopped in time.

These results give the same final amount under the goal difference system: 11-7, 10-6, 5-1, 4-0 and many more. All these scores would give you 4 points.

With the system we normally use for games like this, the final points for the highscore table would be: 103, 94, 49 & 40. Not one tie.

Would it be so horrible to make the goal scoring the most important thing in some games, when its for the best?

Just my opinion.
Frankie
User avatar
roncli
MARPaltunnel Wrists
MARPaltunnel Wrists
Posts: 514
Joined: Thu Apr 25, 2002 12:49 pm
Location: Pittsburg, CA
Contact:

Post by roncli »

IMHO a point is a point. In a game, points are all that matters. Someone who loses certainly should not be better than someone who wins. That's my main concern here. Ties don't bother me, the system can handle them.
-roncli
Frankie
Editor
Posts: 910
Joined: Fri Mar 08, 2002 11:16 pm
Location: Denmark
Contact:

Post by Frankie »

Rules and scores updated according to new rule:

Goals for - Goals against.
Frankie
Post Reply