Moderator: BBH
PP. wrote:I don't put something in your mouth, just a question
PP. wrote:You're talking about tour4000, spacewin and videopkr
That's putting words in my mouth by telling me that I'm talking about those particular games with reference to my < 5 mins comment.PP. wrote:Who told you that they need <5 min? You are completely ignorant
As I said, I only made a question.BeeJay wrote:PP. wrote:I don't put something in your mouth, just a questionPP. wrote:You're talking about tour4000, spacewin and videopkrThat's putting words in my mouth by telling me that I'm talking about those particular games with reference to my < 5 mins comment.PP. wrote:Who told you that they need <5 min? You are completely ignorant
That was not illegal.BeeJay wrote: Just go back and look at a a whole lot of your early recordings when you first arrived here.
No, it was a statement after which you inserted a ? symbol to try to make it look like a "what is he thinking" rather than a true question, especially given how you followed up that statement.PP. wrote:As I said, I only made a question.
After the word 'videopkr' there's a '?', which you deleted.
Who said anything about "illegal". You asked for an example, I gave you plenty to choose from.PP. wrote:That was not illegal.BeeJay wrote: Just go back and look at a a whole lot of your early recordings when you first arrived here.
You deleted the question mark in order to change the meaning of my phrase, so there are no excuses.BeeJay wrote:No, it was a statement after which you inserted a ? symbol to try to make it look like a "what is he thinking" rather than a true question, especially given how you followed up that statement.PP. wrote:As I said, I only made a question.
After the word 'videopkr' there's a '?', which you deleted.
If they were legal then why you complain?BeeJay wrote:Who said anything about "illegal". You asked for an example, I gave you plenty to choose from.PP. wrote: That was not illegal.
I warned mods about bogus scores and I was ignored. Some of them were confirmed(babypac2, garoubl) instead of deleting. If a score is confirmed means that it's 'legal', so anybody can do it too. Since we 're equals and Saulon is not smarter than the rest of us, I uploaded my score too. So next time if mods don't want to be exposed again, they have to listen to such warnings.No mod made a mistake. As you've been told numerous times in the past, a confirmed score simply means that it plays back to the claimed score, but once again you refuse to take in this information no matter how many times you get told this. What you did was upload a score using the very same technique you complained about, once again proving how hypocritical you are in claiming to care about this site..
A true question still reads as a question without a question mark symbol at the end. I removed it to make it more obvious that what you wrote was not a question simply because a '?' symbol was added. ie: People also use the addition of a '?' symbol to imply that someone is being dumb!PP. wrote:You deleted the question mark in order to change the meaning of my phrase, so there are no excuses.
Read the post that brought this up as it's blindingly obvious why.PP. wrote:If they were legal then why you complain?
Hm, what else could you possibly have meant then when you said the following, on 08 Jul 2017 at 18:43:PP. wrote:What examble? I haven't asked you for any examble.
I'm obviously mistaking that as a request to know some examples of games, but clearly that's not what you meant by those two words even though it seems very unlikely for that statement to be ambiguous or taken in any other way.PP. wrote:Which then?BeeJay wrote: No I'm not talking about any of those games.
What part of "a confirmed score simply means it plays back to the claimed score" are you failing to understand. It's not that hard a concept to understand. To go ahead and upload a recording using the very same technique about which you've complained is hypocritical and certainly not the actions of someone supposedly trying to "help improve this site" as you keep claiming.PP. wrote:I warned mods about bogus scores and I was ignored. Some of them were confirmed(babypac2, garoubl) instead of deleting. If a score is confirmed means that it's 'legal', so anybody can do it too. Since we 're equals and Saulon is not smarter than the rest of us, I uploaded my score too. So next time if mods don't want to be exposed again, they have to listen to such warnings.
Once more, don't try to change the meaning of my phrases.BeeJay wrote: A true question still reads as a question without a question mark symbol at the end. I removed it to make it more obvious that what you wrote was not a question simply because a '?' symbol was added. ie: People also use the addition of a '?' symbol to imply that someone is being dumb!
I thought you talked for the recent luck games because you said 'roll on more shitty recordings on games that don't even count for LB points',BeeJay wrote: Read the post that brought this up as it's blindingly obvious why........................
This is already discussed. If there's an inp which plays back to the claimed score but not in the right way, for examble a sudden glitch gives 1 billion score, then confirmer has to confirm the score?BeeJay wrote: What part of "a confirmed score simply means it plays back to the claimed score" are you failing to understand. It's not that hard a concept to understand. To go ahead and upload a recording using the very same technique about which you've complained is hypocritical and certainly not the actions of someone supposedly trying to "help improve this site" as you keep claiming.
I'm not changing the meaning. Write your question as a proper question, not a statement with a '?' symbol at the end, and there won't be a problem.PP. wrote:Once more, don't try to change the meaning of my phrases.
You thought wrong.... and by the way, luck games by their very nature is why luck games are shitty recordings for a high-score site!PP. wrote:I thought you talked for the recent luck games
And I explained why you're being a hypocrite by uploading it, and somewhat childish about it. "Waahh, waahh... Saulon did it so I should be allowed to do it..... Waahhh, waahh waahhh". Grow up for goodneess sake mate!PP. wrote:I explained why I uploaded same technique inp: because nobody is 'smarter' than the rest of the players.
You do change the meaning. And you do it continuously. Silly tactic.BeeJay wrote: I'm not changing the meaning. Write your question as a proper question, not a statement with a '?' symbol at the end, and there won't be a problem.
Phil stll uploads luck games(although he knows that soon they'll get asterisk), so I guess he heard you.BeeJay wrote: and by the way, luck games by their very nature is why luck games are shitty recordings for a high-score site!
Once more, that was not hypocrisy. If Saulon can upload bogus score then I can too. I' m not a sucker. We must all have the same rights. Upload from all, delete to all.BeeJay wrote: And I explained why you're being a hypocrite by uploading it, and somewhat childish about it. "Waahh, waahh... Saulon did it so I should be allowed to do it..... Waahhh, waahh waahhh". Grow up for goodneess sake mate!
PS: It's one game and one score. Can you really not ignore uploading your own one that does the same thing you complained about and just be a little bit more patient and wait for the invalid score to be zeroed?
To complain about someone doing something that you believe is wrong, and then to do the exact same thing yourself is most definitely hypocritical.PP. wrote:Once more, that was not hypocrisy.
Why? You can't justify doing something 'wrong' by pointing out someone else doing the same thing.PP. wrote:If Saulon can upload bogus score then I can too.
I never claimed you were.PP. wrote:I' m not a sucker.
So, because nobody with the ability has yet reviewed and removed a score achieved in a manner not intended by the games developers that means anyone else can knowingly upload with the same bogus technique even when they are the one who pointed it out. No, of course it doesn't mean that, and you trying to claim that it does mean that is you once again being belligerent. As I said before, is it not possible for you just to ignore that one game, or are you so intent on being an LBW that you just can't leave any game alone, even if it means using a technique that you yourself are complaining about just to try and get one more game into your LB total?PP. wrote:We must all have the same rights. Upload from all, delete to all.
No, my brain works perfectly fine but thanks for the insult. The reason you feel the need to repeat and repeat and repeat is because you refuse to accept the obvious and continue to try and justify the unjustifiable.PP. wrote:Why do I have replay all the time, is your brain broken? You force me repeat and repeat and repeat...
BeeJay wrote: To complain about someone doing something that you believe is wrong, and then to do the exact same thing yourself is most definitely hypocritical.
......
Why? You can't justify doing something 'wrong' by pointing out someone else doing the same thing.
Already answered, and many times.BeeJay wrote: .....even if it means using a technique that you yourself are complaining about just to try and get one more game into your LB total?
The reason I have to repeat is that you force me to do it. What are you trying to get with this method?BeeJay wrote: The reason you feel the need to repeat and repeat and repeat is because you refuse to accept the obvious and continue to try and justify the unjustifiable.
No. You've repeatedly tried to use the same invalid justification for doing the very technique you brought up as one that shouldn't be allowed.PP. wrote:Already answered, and many times.BeeJay wrote: To complain about someone doing something that you believe is wrong, and then to do the exact same thing yourself is most definitely hypocritical.
......
Why? You can't justify doing something 'wrong' by pointing out someone else doing the same thing.
No, you have tried to justify you doing the same thing as you complained about, which is either being hypocritical or trying to justify the unjustifiable.PP. wrote:Already answered, and many times.BeeJay wrote: .....even if it means using a technique that you yourself are complaining about just to try and get one more game into your LB total?
Well now you're just talking semantics because pointing out a bogus score is the same as complaining about the technique that someone used with a view to getting the technique banned. Please note that I'm not in any way suggesting it is a bad thing to "complain" when someone has used a potentially bannable technique. In fact that is to be encouraged as not one person can be expeced to watch every single replay for things like this.PP. wrote:Note that pointing out a bogus score is not a complaint, is a matter which refers to all players.
I'm not forcing you to do anything.PP. wrote:The reason I have to repeat is that you force me to do it.
What method? I'm just responding to your continued attempts at justifying doing the very thing you were complaining about.PP. wrote:What are you trying to get with this method?
No, but when something has been pointed out to you time, and time again it should then be obvious.PP. wrote:What is obvious to you doesn't necessarily means that its obvious to all.
You have repeatedly said that you should be allowed to use the technique you complained about because someone else has used it and nothing has been done about their score yet. That's attempting to justify something.PP. wrote:I don't try to justify something
What insults? If you feel like you're being insulted, how do you think I feel with you suggesting my brain doesn't work etc?PP. wrote:I only answer to your insults...
What lies? I could easily take offence at you suggesting that I am lying, but I won't I'm just interested in where you think I have lied?PP. wrote:... and lies.
As I said I don't use justifications, I only answer and explain things, and with many replays.BeeJay wrote: invalid justification for doing the very technique you brought up as one that shouldn't be allowed?
Same as above, and already answered many times.BeeJay wrote: No, you have tried to justify you doing the same thing as you complained about, which is either being hypocritical or trying to justify the unjustifiable.?
As I said its not a complaint, its a matter which refers to all players.BeeJay wrote:Well now you're just talking semantics because pointing out a bogus score is the same as complaining about the technique..............
Then stop posting same things again and again, they are already answered several times.BeeJay wrote: I'm not forcing you to do anything.
The method of repeating posts which have been answered.BeeJay wrote: What method? I'm just responding to your continued attempts at justifying doing the very thing you were complaining about.
What are you talking about exactly? I have answered to all.BeeJay wrote: No, but when something has been pointed out to you time, and time again it should then be obvious.
I never said that I should be allowed to use that technique.BeeJay wrote: You have repeatedly said that you should be allowed to use the technique you complained about because someone else has used it and nothing has been done about their score yet. That's attempting to justify something.
Boy, you are a professional liar and a lingering troll.BeeJay wrote: What lies? I could easily take offence at you suggesting that I am lying, but I won't I'm just interested in where you think I have lied?
Semantics of "pointing out" vs "complaining" aside, a complaint is still a complaint regardless of whether it refers to one or all players.PP. wrote:As I said its not a complaint, its a matter which refers to all players.
So what exactly did you mean by the following then?PP. wrote:I never said that I should be allowed to use that technique.
To me that seems very much like you attempting to justify why you uploaded a score using a techique about which you had complained. Please don't use your usual "I'm just responding to posts" argument, the above is clearly someone trying to justify why they uploaded their score.PP. wrote:Mine was created only after his was confirmed.simpsons99 wrote:I am glad you are ok with his score getting removed as long as yours is removed also.
Again, where exactly have I lied in this thread and why does disagreeing with you make me a lingering troll?BeeJay wrote:Boy, you are a professional liar and a lingering troll.
Pot, kettle, black. Also, you're making some assumptions about how long it takes me to type a post... It's somewhat dangerous to assume things like that about people you've never met...PP. wrote:Looks like you have an enormous free time for posting
Already answered.BeeJay wrote: Semantics of "pointing out" vs "complaining" aside, a complaint is still a complaint regardless of whether it refers to one or all players.
Both scores should remain or deleted together. That is what 9BallNinja wanted too.BeeJay wrote: So what exactly did you mean by the following then?To me that seems very much like you attempting to justify why you uploaded a score using a techique about which you had complained.PP. wrote:Mine was created only after his was confirmed.simpsons99 wrote:I am glad you are ok with his score getting removed as long as yours is removed also.
lol, as they say in my villageBeeJay wrote: Again, where exactly have I lied in this thread and why does disagreeing with you make me a lingering troll?
