Not at all. I think the way #1 is stated even with the first post as I said it's clear not all aspects that John is considering and implies with it aren't stated. How can you understand what's not even stated? Would it have been so difficult to at least include the word "deliberately" in the poll question? Hmm, that would have helped it a lot. I think "repeatedly caught at deliberately cheating" would have been even better. These don't make the question that much longer. If that phrase was in the question I would have definitely voted for the first choice.Buttermaker wrote:You lack common sense.
Sure, it's still only for opinion. However, you see my real opinion on this from a couple of my posts in this read. My vote for the poll doesn't properly express my opinion at all...whether I voted for #1 or #2.
Given 3-4 others expressed similar I don't think it's just me. Something like this isn't such a black-n-white issue.
I think for action as drastic as banning someone and removing their scores it would require a vote of the editors with at least 75% agreeing or perhaps for something as drastic as banishment 100% of the active editors must agree for that action.
The problem is not wanting to assume exactly what the question is asking. It was not possible for me to express my opinion voting either way. I think many others are similar so the poll results don't really accomplish much except perhaps get the editors to discuss the issue and perhaps revise it with some compromise.The problem here isn't reading. It's understanding.
I think what I mentioned above of forcing certain players that have been proved to cheat to use wolfmame or alphamame as a first action is common sense. Hmm, your post mentioned nothing along these lines also.